So it seems like it's meant to be the sequel to The Wizard of Oz. But there are a few continuity issues here.

First, Dorothy is younger.

Second, Aunt Em and Uncle Henry look different (as well as the Cowardly Lion being four-legged instead of anthromoporphic, and I think I remember them changing the Tin Man's appearance slightly too). I know they were all recast but they look nothing like them, except Dorothy, but again, she's younger.

Third, Emerald City seems more made of crystal than emerald this time around.

Fourth, I think I remember them saying something about Ozma's father being in power before the Wizard came, yet this didn't seem to hold true in the prequel, Oz: The Great and Powerful, where, if I recall correctly, the Wicked Witch of the East is in power. No mention of a previous king of Oz, or Mombi, or the Nome King.

Does this film fit into canon?

On that note, what of Legends of Oz: Dorothy's Return, is it canon either?

I noticed the website to keep a list of world wide recordings, I saw no Dutch recordings there, if anyone is interested at all in Dutch audio, here is a link to my website containing the known Dutch audio recordings (not that many, as far as I know these are the only ones): http://kroniekenvanoz.nl/nl-oz-audio/

Hi there, I was wandering if it was possible to mention, perhaps in a single article, some information about the new Dutch translations I'm working on personnally? It is 'our' intent to translate and publish all of the original Baum Oz books in Dutch. Currently we are working on the 'Queer Visitors' book. I was looking to publish as list of translations with the books we've done so far and keep it updated as books are getting published. And a short history of the project.

For those interested, here is a link to the page (shamelees selfpromotion ;-) ), it needs a little updating though; www.kroniekenvanoz.nl

Hello everyone!

Are there books that deepen the history of the four witches?

https://www.ebay.com/sch/greelk_1/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_ipg=&_from=

Do we have a confirmation that Erin Mackey and Mariand Torres will be the next Glinda and Elphaba on the Munchkinland tour?

Hello, i like the 2 Oz Movies and have 2 Question, where in England or America was the ruin Emerald City from the 1985 "Return to Oz" Movie? and where was the Mountain and the Nic-Nac Room from the evil Nome King?

For those not aware, Codename STEAM is a strategy game put out by Nintendo subsidiary Intelligent Systems. I won't bore you with all the details, but long story short, it uses a lot of classic literary characters in it, including Dorthy, the (not so) Cowardly Lion, the Tin Man, and the Scarecrow. It's not set in Oz (though the Tinman will sometime shout "For Oz!"), and while characters do often make references back to their original works, it's not an Oz-centered game, though they do make up one third of the playable cast (not counting the four Amiibo Fire Emblem crossover characters).

Do they allow fanon on this wiki, or is there a separate Oz wiki for fanon.

I want to translate all the content of this wiki to portuguese, but I can't do it, so, can you create, admin, a version of this wiki in portuguese, too? As you did with Spanish?

That was special song played in one of read alogs. I SO WANT TO FIND IT AGAIN! <3

Hi there people! Some of you may know that I've been clear about why I adopted this wiki, but some of you may not; for new comers, I might look like a bureaucrat who does nothing for this wiki, and sadly it really does seem like that for quite some time, so I just want to make it clear again that I'm mostly here to serve as a janitor; thankfully there has not been any atrocious act of trolling or spamming the wiki with a bunch of redundant duplicated images lately, but yes, that's what I'm here for if it unfortunately happens again.

Now, contrary to what may have been the popular belief, I DO in fact monitor the Special:RecentChanges of this wiki even though I'm not actively contributing myself. It has come to my attention that the article for the Wizard of Oz (character) has been moved around, and I want to know if the majority of you guys think the renaming action is justified, cuz personally I'm voting a NO; however, like I said before, my knowledge to this franchise is only scratching the surface, so I would really like to hear what true fans have to say about this. Please comment below and specify why or why not you think the article name change is necessary.

Also, in the future, please do not take "rename" likely when it comes to important articles like this one; meaning all the original characters that have appeared in the first book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz; they are most well known to people, and any big changes really should have been discussed first as "rename" the action itself will effect a lot of pages that have been linked to renamed pages.

So as we know, the films are not officially related to one another. MGM owns the rights to the 1939 film, while Disney owns Oz and Return to Oz. Tin Man comes on SyFy. However, despite this, they all can be somewhat bridged together. Anyone wanna help me figure out how?

1. Oz the Great and Powerful comes first, acting as a prequel to the series.
2. The Wizard of Oz (1939) is the second film in the series, taking place sometime after the events in Oz TGAP, with only some minor changes. But let's just pretend Glinda changed titles and dyed her hair.
3. Return to Oz (film) takes place six months after the 1939 film, telling what happened after Dorothy returned from Oz.
4. Tin Man (miniseries) takes place many years after all of these, with Dorothy acting as D.G.'s ancestor.

This is the best continuity. However, one could also go

1. Oz the Great and Powerful
2. The Wizard of Oz (1939)
3. Dorothy and the Witches of Oz, however, this is less likely as it mostly establishes it's own continuity, with no connections.

It could also be

1. Oz the Great and Powerful
2. The Wizard of Oz (1939)
3. Legends of Oz: Dorothy's Return, however, again this isn't likely as it mentions the Jester being Theodora and Evanora's brother, while OTGAP never mentioned this at all.